On fredag, sep 6, 2002, at 21:57 Europe/Stockholm, Tim Thorne wrote: > OK, what if 60 Hudson, 25 Broadway, LinX and AmsIX were all put out of > commission? To some extent - nothing for the above...if design right. The major networks should have designed their networks to route around this. If not - they have done a poor job. For others, the exchange points should be a way merely to off-load their transit connections. However - there is a point in what you are saying, from a national point of view - the exchange points should independently take care of traffic in the case a nation is isolated. But I don't think any of the above are designed for that in the first place... - kurtis -
- RE: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection Daniel Golding
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection Dave Israel
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection Tim Thorne
- RE: Vulnerbilities of Interconnectio... Al Rowland
- RE: Vulnerbilities of Interconn... Jeff Shultz
- RE: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Brad Knowles
- RE: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Jeff Shultz
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... John M. Brown
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnectio... Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconn... John M. Brown
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Sean Donelan
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Inter... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- How about a game of chess? (was Re: Vulnerbiliti... Sean Donelan
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection sgorman1
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection batz