On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> > RD> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:05:32 -0400 (EDT) > RD> From: Ralph Doncaster > > > RD> Not really, what I want is router A to learn that ther is no > RD> next hop IP- the subnet is on the local ethernet. > > As others are saying... it isn't "local". It's not "local" > unless in the same subnet. Physical topology often correlates > with higher layers, but it's not strictly 1:1. Manually configuring a static route in router A would achieve the result: ip route 172.16.16.0 255.255.255.0 fa0/0 However, I'm surprised that there's no dynamic routing protocol that allows you to do everything you can with static routes. -Ralph