On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:58:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to definition, is should take the same path, but are there any > > > > other cases that I should be aware of? > > > > > > According to the definition, it is going to show you the path the packets > > > took from you to the destination, not from the destination back. > > > > > > > Unless you did "- g", > > Not correct. -g specifies loose source routing on the way *there*, not back.
Alex, I think the intention was to indicate that you can traceroute -g <remote-router-before-host> <your-local-ip> to get the path to and back. -g requires an argument obviously.. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.