On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The full paper is available at: > > http://whopper.sbs.ohio-state.edu/grads/tgrubesi/survive.pdf > > password: grubesic > > It was posted on the www.cybergeography.org website with the password, > plus I'm sure Tony would like the feedback.
Was this paper peer reviewed ? I'm interested in the problem, but this is not the paper. AT&T's network is the most vulnerable? While Onyx is among the least vulnerable? Onyx is bankrupt, and their network is no longer in operation. I guess you could argue Onyx not vulnerable any more. This paper starts out with some bad assumptions, such as there is one NAP in a city, one path between cities or the marketing maps in Boardwatch are meaningful. Until we figure out how to collect some meaningful starting data, we can't draw these types of conclusions.
