at Monday, January 27, 2003 7:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was seen to say: > This is not correct. VPN simply extends security policy to a different > location. A VPN user must make sure that local security policy > prevents other traffic from entering VPN connection. This is nice in theory, but in practice is simply not true. even assuming that the most restrictive settings are used (user may not install software by admin setting, has no local administration on his machine, IP traffic other than via the VPN is exclusive to the vpn client) it is *still* possible that the machine could be compromised by (say) an email virus who then bypasses security by any one of a dozen routes.
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Level3 routing issues? alex
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Level3 routing issues? alex
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Simon Lockhart
- Re: Level3 routing issues? alex
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Simon Lockhart
- Re: Level3 routing issues? alex
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Level3 routing issues? alex
- VPN clients and security models David Howe
- VPN clients and security models alex
- Re: VPN clients and security models Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: VPN clients and security models David Howe
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Robert A. Hayden
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Jack Bates
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Daniel Senie
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Jared Mauch
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Avleen Vig
- Re: Level3 routing issues? Jack Bates