On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:19:58PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote: > > It actually looked like it was farther in the att network, after cw's peer > the next hop after cw's peer. > > I just tried the trace again and it seems better. > > Cw seems to be handing off to att at a different point in santaclara now > not sanfrancisco which seemed to help. > Again though it looked like att was the issue because cw looked fine up > tntil one hop after cw ended.
route-server.ip.att.net When in doubt, try looking at the reverse path. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)