Hello Jack ,
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
> Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > Hello Charles & All , Love all of you that want to filter ,
> > Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been
> > running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup , isdn ,
> > adsl , cable . Never could get any employer to fork over better
> > than that . It brings to mind something Randy said ,(something
> > like) I highly recommend that my compititon ...
> > That way people (ie: customers who know better) will find a
> > non/inteligent-filering provider . Please THINK before doing .
> > Hth , JimL
> You seem to think that customers give ISPs a choice. The fact is,
> customers scream about the 50-90% spam that hits their mailbox and want
> it gone at any cost. Whitelisting is easy, and done when requested.
> Customers are happy.
White listing is NOT what was being discussed . Tho is can be
adventagous in the right circumstances .
> The stance now stands, if you can't afford a static IP address to
> properly run a mail server, then use a smart host. If a server isn't
> static, then the IP address can't be trusted or the next guy at that IP
> address will be a spammer. Most places will whitelist based on email
> address or vanity domain if asked.
And neither was Static addressing . Filtering was being discussed
based on some unknown (to me probably others as well) methodology .
Twyl , JimL
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
