On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Paul Vixie wrote: > > > I don't believe I ever said that the edges shouldn't filter... did I? > > nope. but you said that backbones couldn't/wouldn't/shouldn't, and i > showed that "transitivity" => "laundering", which means backbones MUST > filter, to within the best capabilities of current technology. > thats fair enough.
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Vadim Antonov
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Mike Tancsa
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions David G. Andersen
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Barney Wolff
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Jason Robertson
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions bdragon
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions variable
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Petri Helenius
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Petri Helenius
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie