All of "my" bounces are coming from emails that originated from 195.157.87.253... Maybe it's the same guy with others here?
Mark Fyi.. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> whois -h whois.ripe.net 195.157.87.253 % This is the RIPE Whois server. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % Rights restricted by copyright. % See http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/copyright.html inetnum: 195.157.70.0 - 195.157.87.255 netname: NSUK-PARTITION-LL descr: Connectivity country: GB admin-c: NSUK2-RIPE tech-c: NSUK1-RIPE status: LIR-PARTITIONED PA remarks: ************************************************************** remarks: * Please do not send abuse reports to tech or admin contacts * remarks: * All abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * remarks: ************************************************************** remarks: * This is an partition object and does not represent a valid # remarks: # assignment. Valid assignments have status: ASSIGNED PA # remarks: ############################################################## notify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mnt-by: NETSCALIBURUK-MNT mnt-lower: NETSCALIBURUK-MNT changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20011025 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020110 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020514 source: RIPE route: 195.157.0.0/16 descr: Netscalibur UK Ltd origin: AS8272 mnt-by: NETSCALIBURUK-MNT changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20010706 source: RIPE role: Netscalibur UK Hostmaster address: Netscalibur UK Ltd address: 9 Selsdon Way address: Cityharbour address: London E14 9GL address: UK phone: +44 (0)870 887 8800 fax-no: +44 (0)870 887 8867 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin-c: CSP3-RIPE admin-c: SY131-RIPE tech-c: NSUK1-RIPE tech-c: NSUK3-RIPE nic-hdl: NSUK2-RIPE remarks: Hostmaster remarks: **** remarks: * All abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] remarks: **** notify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mnt-by: NETSCALIBURUK-MNT changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20010712 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20010731 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020109 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020116 source: RIPE role: Netscalibur UK NOC address: Netscalibur UK Ltd address: 9 Selsdon Way address: Cityharbour address: London E14 9GL address: UK phone: +44 (0)845 117 2200 fax-no: +44 (0)870 887 8867 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin-c: ZP64-RIPE admin-c: DJH8-RIPE tech-c: NSUK2-RIPE tech-c: NSUK3-RIPE nic-hdl: NSUK1-RIPE remarks: Network Operations Center remarks: **** remarks: * All abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] remarks: **** notify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mnt-by: NETSCALIBURUK-MNT changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20010711 changed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20020116 source: RIPE -- Mark Segal Director, Network Planning FCI Broadband Tel: 905-284-4070 Fax: 416-987-4701 http://www.fcibroadband.com Futureway Communications Inc. is now FCI Broadband -----Original Message----- From: Jim Deleskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 20, 2003 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications? Kind of like a statement made @ a security conference I was recently at, 'Hacking from the conference = Dismissal, if you have to ask No you shouldn't' -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications? > Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:25:28 -0400 > From: Joe Maimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications? > > > Considering the amount of email traffic generated by responding to > forged virus laden email from culprits like sobig should email virus > scanning systems be configured to send notifications back to sender or not? Not.