On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone who doesn't think that's an operational issue, just wait until it > > > bites you on the ass. > > > > Now we have clear evidence that there are no less than three who > > understand the threat. > > My first thought was that the DDoS was a means of obscuring access to > patches for other vulnerabilities that might be simulatenously exploited. > I'm assuming, though not certain, that Cisco would have alternative > distribution/communication/update channels in such an event, but is that > indeed the case?
My access to ftp.cisco.com is working fine whilst the website remains down.. Steve
