Sean Donelan wrote: > > An "anonymous reader" using almost identical language to Verisign >.... Usage of the patch unexpectedly > broke at least 7 Top Level Domains, ISC announced 3 weeks later, after > users started having problems.
Where? I cannot find the announcement. >... how will the Verisign GRS > make the wildcard capability available to all ICANN acredited .COM and > .NET registrars without creating a conflict of interest? Why shouldn't > all ICANN accredited registrars be able to enter wildcards in the .COM and > .NET zone files on a equal access basis? Or is the Verisign GRS favoring > its corporate sibling by entering special information in the .COM or .NET > zone files for its sibling's benefit without offering the same capability > to all other registrars. > Good point! > Registry Code of Conduct > http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-appi-com-25may01.htm Also handy! Thanks! -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32