Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Just out of curiousity, I wonder how many domain registrations those of us > on nanog represent? Contract sanctions from ICANN are one thing, taking > all of our business elsewhere might also be effective at getting a point > across (though it might also backfire - pushing Verisign to be even more > agressive at taking advantage of their positioning). > We moved ours long ago (with the exception of a few customers that inexplicably demanded to stay with VeriSign nee NetSol). I expect most network savvy folk everywhere moved, too. -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
- more on VeriSign to revive redirect service David Lesher
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect servi... Miles Fidelman
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect s... Mike Lewinski
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redire... Ray Bellis
- RE: more on VeriSign to revive redirect s... William Allen Simpson
- RE: more on VeriSign to revive redire... Kevin Bednar
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect s... Christopher X. Candreva
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect servi... Leo Bicknell
- RE: more on VeriSign to revive redirect servi... McBurnett, Jim
- RE: more on VeriSign to revive redirect s... Owen DeLong
- RE: more on VeriSign to revive redire... Jeff Shultz
- Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect servi... Michael . Dillon
- Verisign to spin off NetSol?! WAS Re: mor... up
- Verisign is selling Netsol [was Re: more ... Kee Hinckley
- Re: Verisign is selling Netsol [was R... Bruce Campbell