On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:53 CDT, Andrew D Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:
> I would certainly say there's an elitism, or perhaps a higher level of
> credibility given to a .com or .net site, due to the fact that they've probably
> existed for quite a bit longer than a .biz or .info.

Most of my spam points back to .com addresses.  Not much credibility generated
there...

There's sufficient churn on the bottom-feeding .com's that it's not a reliable
indicator.  Now you want *stability*, look for a site that's got a .arpa other than
in-addr.arpa :)

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to