Avleen Vig wrote: > If "more IP addresses" is the only motivation for using IPv6, it's > really not enough. For environments where direct access to the > internet isn't required, NAT serves perfectly well. IPSec, SIP/VoIP or almost anything that relies on UDP borks on NAT, doesn't it?
- [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) Andy Dills
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) Petri Helenius
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) Cliff Albert
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) william
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) Stefan Mink
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd) Avleen Vig
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fw... Dave Howe
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Spac... Simon Lockhart
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address ... Avleen Vig
- Re[2]: [arin-announce] IPv4 A... Richard Welty
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Addr... Dave Howe
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Addr... Jack Bates
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Addr... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Addr... Owen DeLong
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address ... Dave Howe
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address ... Owen DeLong
- Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Spac... Owen DeLong