On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:38:10AM -0800, Pete Ehlke wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > > ps - there's of course the rather umm... interesting content below ;) > > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html > > > Which is totally, completely wrong and causes, in both cases, servers to > leak name space (which causes cache poisoning) and, in once case, > servers to potentially be marked as lame. The man is flat out wrong. > Don't follow his advice.
How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme? --Adam