> Don't they use YYYYMMDDNN now? So today's version whould be 2004010801. > AFAIK, 1076370400 is actually "less" then 2004010801... > > I know there are ways to "trick" nameservers in believing less is more, > but that requires at least 2 changes, and I don't know if that is > actually RFC-compliant behaviour...
maybe someone would like to read rfc 2182 section 7 randy