Frank Louwers wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:34:46PM +0000, Maarten Van Horenbeeck wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > Dag Maarten, > > > > stuid question, but isn't 2004010101 (today) > 1076370400 (9 Feb 2004)? > > > > This doesn't apply here. It is perfectly possible to decrease the value > > of your serial number without any consequences for the DNS slave/master > > zone transfers, if you adhere to the procedures put forward in RFC 1912 > > (section 3.1). The fact that the newly introduced serial is lower will > > thus not have any consequences from this perspective. > > Yes, but we all know there are quite some non-compliant dns-servers out > there. Do they want to break the largest zone for a few days for all > non-compliant servers? > > Oh, wait, right, they don't care if they break stuff...
Since I am currently unemployed I guess it is only as they say of academic interest to me, but I don't see why it doesn't break it, and for functionally all of time.