That's what I assumed but I asked the question anyhow just to confirm my assumption(s). Scott C. McGrath On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Gerald wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Scott McGrath wrote: > > > The question here is what are you trying to defend against?. > > If that question was directed at me, I am just checking to make sure > nothing is new on the packet sniffing / detecting scene that I haven't > heard about. It also seemed to me to have been a long time since the > subject of detecting packet sniffers was brought up. (not just on NANOG) > > I know there are ways to get around being detected, but I'm just trying to > make sure I'm doing my best to catch the less than professional sniffers > on my networks. > > Gerald >
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Joel Jaeggli
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Sam Stickland
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Scott McGrath
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Donovan Hill
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Donovan Hill
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Deepak Jain
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector E.B. Dreger
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Gerald
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Scott McGrath
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Gerald
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Gerald
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Chris Brenton
- RE: sniffer/promisc detector Wojtek Zlobicki
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Rubens Kuhl Jr.
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Alexei Roudnev
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector haesu
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Alexei Roudnev
- Re: sniffer/promisc detector Vadim Antonov