Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Invalid? Really? I used to manage a small collection of cisco routers and I don't recall any of them complaining about such an address.
Could be related to perhaps not having "ip subnet-zero"? (I have no idea, but the old thingie about highest and lowest network being broadcast/network address might be applicable in this case)
Could be. There are a number of things that don't work right if they are not configured correctly.
