Daniel Karrenberg wrote:



Correct, but only in the absence of more specific filtering.
the problem this proposal aims to correct is the increasing number of
false positives caused by the apparent *serious* lag in relatively
static bogon filtering.




Do you think this can be fixed after vendors started putting in bogon lists into their SME and SOHO products and let loose the consultants promoting them as "plug-and-play security for small office"? There is probably hundreds of thousands of these devices out there.

Pete

Reply via email to