on Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:31:59PM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote: > I can understand the reasoning behind what they are doing, but perhaps > they are taking things in the wrong direction. Our abuse@ email address > is just that, abused. Our abuse@ mailbox gets probably 500+ spams a day > with maybe 2-3 legit emails that we need to look at. Sure we could run > anti-spam measures on the abuse@ address but that probably isn't the way > to go since most complaints to abuse@ are forward spam messages which > could be marked and then missed.
So don't do content-based filtering. > [...] Having our techs/engineers go through the abuse@ box every day > to play hide and seek is a bit of an agonizing task that nobody really > wants, especially at the volume it is today. Isn't it their job? -- hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com Buy "Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation, 2/e" today! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059231X/heskecominc-20/ref=nosim/