On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > Sure. But I do find myself saying "if we were doing IPv6 right now > we wouldn't have this problem" more and more.
Which problem is that? ;) (and if it involves NAT... sorry, no.) > See http://countipv6.bgpexpert.com/. The different numbers under > "site" represent different web pages. 8 is a fairly standard one, > and it gets around 0.15% visits from people who are v6-capable. And are these sites in any way related to IPv6 or networking? (news at 11, Web sites about IPv6 get less than 1% v6 traffic ;) ) regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fortune: If your happiness depends on what somebody else does, I guess you do have a problem. -- Richard Bach, "Illusions"
