ah yes.. forgot about that :) Thanks, -J
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:24:02PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, James wrote: > > > i can see this 'attack' operational against a multihop bgp session that's > > not md5'd. > > > > now the question is... would this also affect single-hop bgp sessions? > > my understanding would be no, as single-hops require ttl set to 1. > > you can engineer packets to make sure they have the right ttl when they arrive, > ie if your 10 hops away, set ttl to 10 and it will be 1 on arrival :) > > Steve > > > > > -J > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 01:36:09PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 > > > Sentex Communications, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net > > > Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike > > > > -- James Jun TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net