On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:40:38 EDT, "Patrick W.Gilmore" said: > Assuming a well randomized starting sequence number (just give me this > one for the moment),
Nope. I won't give you that one, because that's a big chunk of the problem: http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/newtcp/ (one year later) http://razor.bindview.com/publish/papers/tcpseq.html (original paper) It seems that Cisco has its act mostly together, but a *LOT* of other vendors don't, even a year after...
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
