Aha! An answer to what I saw when configuring a client's box! In my case, the messages stopped after about 10 minutes and everything settled down but it was qute confusing..
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 11:52:45AM -0600, James Edwards wrote: > On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 04:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > It certainly doesn't work between Cisco and Juniper, because the Juniper > > always resets the session when you configure a new MD5 key. > > Ah, that explains way I flapped sessions that were juniper/cisco > and not ones that were cisco/cisco when setting the key. It looked > like this in the logs, this is on a session that did not have > a key, previous. Ouch !: > > Apr 22 14:45:51.105 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:45:51.145 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:45:52.105 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:45:52.917 MDT: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by vty0 > (xxx.xxx.5.205) > Apr 22 14:45:54.105 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:45:58.113 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:46:06.105 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:46:22.106 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:46:54.106 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:47:20.295 MDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.205 Down BGP > Notification sent > Apr 22 14:47:20.295 MDT: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.205 4/0 > (hold time expired) 0 bytes > Apr 22 14:47:39.083 MDT: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.205 Up > Apr 22 14:47:58.183 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:49:02.121 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:50:06.113 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:51:10.117 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:52:14.135 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > Apr 22 14:53:18.125 MDT: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from xxx.xxx.xxx.205(1156) to > xxx.xxx.xxx.206(179) > > I am assuming the log entries about BADAUTH after the session came up were the > effect of log buffering ? > > --- Wayne Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/