On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > Ah....., but, then how can we keep the lamers (i.e. wannabes/non > nanoggers) out effectively? :P
Let me guess, DDoS them away? IRC is simply the most evil thing ever invented. BTW, I've actually got two sites that were part of the DDoS to find then remove servers that were taking part in the attack. I am pleasantly surprised. And kudos to Comcast Business Services for having an intelligent and effective abuse desk. Charles > -- Jonathan > > andrew matthews wrote: > > i thought there was nanog @efnet with a lot of these people on it... > > i'm sure there are plenty of chat networks out tehre without having to > > start a new one. > > > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:47:52 -0500, Bubba Parker > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>My IRC server is at irc.citynetwireless.net. It runs dancer-ircd 1.0.35 > >>along with its own services (Nick/ChanServ/etc) and stays up as long as > >>my DS3 does :). > >> > >>On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:29:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>Hey, > >>> > >>> > >>>Let me know if the IRC server has been setup... > >>>I do know there is already a #nanog channel on EFNet.. > >>> > >>> > >>>Regards, > >>>Ken > >>>Network Engineer > >>>CalPOP.com, Inc. > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>>Bubba Parker > >>>Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:01 PM > >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Subject: Re: real-time DDoS help? > >>> > >>>I could host and/or setup the irc server if anyone is interested. > >>> > >>>On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:23:06AM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Jonathan Slivko wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Maybe if NANOG had irc.nanog.org, maybe that might be something > >>> > >>>to > >>> > >>>>>>>consider - a real-time network of communication for network > >>> > >>>operators > >>> > >>>>>>>to deal with issues, etc. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>There's always > >>> > >>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security > >>> > >>>>>I can tell you right off AS8059 doesn't meet the requirements. I'd > >>> > >>>gladly > >>> > >>>>>respond to any reports of attacks from them, but I don't think you'd > >>> > >>>ever > >>> > >>>>>see any. > >>>> > >>>>which of your 2 upstreams isn't helping out? I'm fairly certain both > >>>>providers have security groups, and do mitigate attacks for customers > >>> > >>>on a > >>> > >>>>regular basis. Perhaps you are not getting in touch with the correct > >>>>customer service folks? We often have this issue ;( > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Basement multihomers unite. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>hurray! > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Bubba Parker > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>CityNet LLC > >>>http://www.citynetinfo.com/ > >>> > >> > >>-- > >>Bubba Parker > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>CityNet LLC > >>http://www.citynetinfo.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >>noname - 1K > >> > > > > > > -- > Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" > - http://www.linux.org/ - > > Don't fear the penguin. > .^. > /V\ > /( )\ > ^^-^^ > He's here to help. >
