On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Peter Corlett wrote:
> > Stephen J. Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I currently have a few .255/32s with Cisco and Foundry products and > > have various windows/linux/OSX machines that access them without > > problems.. > > Well, I'd expect Linux and OSX to do the right thing. It just seems to > be Windows that makes a complete sow's ear of it. > > As to the IP addresses ending in 255 that are working from Windows > boxes, would I be right in guessing that the first octet of the IP > addresses in question is between 1 and 191? Hi Peter, actually no.. I just did a test right now, I'm at a friends and using an XP machine connected via a cable modem.. my results arent entirely in agreement with my initial post I tested to both a "Class A" .255 we have and also to a "Class C" .255 we have Class A: works on everything..trace, ping, ssh Class C: spooky, traces up to the interface before the device. wont ping. connections fail with Network error: Cannot assign requested address. But, this same test works when tried from linux - possibly different behaviour between icmp and udp on cisco?? >From the hop-before-last (cisco 7206 12.2(14)S3) if i ping it seems to be broadcasting out of the interface towards the .255 rather than unicasting, i confirm this with a packet capture: 16:03:47.614187 Class-C.x.x.x > 255.255.255.255: icmp: echo request the cisco reports correct routing of the Class-C /32 Steve