On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:44:43AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi,
> As far as other ISPs helping out in the form of a letter to the court,
> what do you need beyond a "well, this is one more route we need to carry
> that we shouldn't have to" and "How do I know how to properly report abuse
> issues regarding this block"?
I would go even further: if there is a dispute over the so-called
ownership of a netblock, there is no party who can guerantee proper
routability and technical responsability so I would probably blackhole
it.
As for the netblock: I just did a quick scan and here is what I found:
64.21.0.0/17 *[BGP/170] 3d 17:52:24, MED 64, localpref 210
AS path: 6320 8001 I
64.21.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 3d 17:52:49, localpref 100
AS path: 3356 3561 6347 25702 I
I'm not sure wether or not 64.21.1.0/24 is the disputed netblock, but
this seems the only more specific without AS8001 in the path.
--
Sabri, "I route, therefore you are"
