On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sam Stickland wrote: > One question about this, the Q-in-Q tunnelling would have to take place on > the switch connected to the ring - what happens if the packet has already > been placed in a dot1Q tunnel? I haven't really worked much with dot1Q > tunneling - are their any know problems with extra tags? (aside from MTU > issues, but I imagine most rings will support at least 9bytes)
Most switches will only see the outer tag and will thus be transparent for Q-in-Q:ed packets. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]