JD, Nice work. Good to hear Hotmail is doing their fair share to be a responsible member of the community by adapting SPF. Does this mean that other improvements, such as not defaulting to sending HTML-tagged e-mail with a 10-column line wrap, aren't far behind? =)
---Rico On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:17 -0700, J.D. Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 07/26/04, Gerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html > > > > Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use, > > but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet? > > From that article: 'Sender ID is a proposed technology standard, > backed by Microsoft, for verifying an e-mail message's source. It > combines two previous standards: the Microsoft-developed "Caller > ID," and the Meng Weng Wong-developed SPF.' > > Here's Hotmail's Caller ID record: > > _ep.hotmail.com text = "<ep xmlns='http://ms.net/1' > testing='true'><out><m><indirect>list1._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list2._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list3._ep.hotmail.com</indirect></m></out></ep>" > > http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid.mspx > > -- > J.D. Falk "...one of the worst signs of our danger > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is we can't imagine the route > from here to utopia." > -- Kim Stanley Robinson >