On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:21:06AM -0700, Dan Lockwood wrote: > I'm in a debate with a guy over the use of 'ip address x.x.x.x s.s.s.s > secondary' on Cisco gear. I seem to remember reading that the use of > secondary addresses is a bad idea, but I can't recall the details of > why. Process switched? Can anyone offer a resource or more specific > information?
One which hasn't been mentioned - DHCP will break horribly if the dhcp shared-subnets declarations don't match the multinetted subnets on the wire.
