On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Randy Bush wrote: > >> If every BGP session in your network is protected by a max-prefix > >> limit, no matter who leaks, the damage will be limited and contained. > > true, also not univeral, > > the problem with max-prefix is it does not say *which* prefixes. > so even if the drop-bgp stoopidity is corrected, you could end > up holding the bogus prefixes, not the good ones. true, however, my point was that not even the basics are being done :(
- Re: Blackhole Routes Erik Haagsman
- Re: Blackhole Routes Wayne E. Bouchard
- Re: Blackhole Routes Deepak Jain
- Re: Blackhole Routes Wayne E. Bouchard
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Blackhole Routes Mark Kasten
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Blackhole Routes Jeff Aitken
- Re: Blackhole Routes Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: Blackhole Routes Randy Bush
- Re: Blackhole Routes Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: Blackhole Routes Randy Bush
- Re: Blackhole Routes Will Yardley
- Re: Blackhole Routes Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Blackhole Routes Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson
- Re: Blackhole Routes Robert E . Seastrom
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson