On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Randy Bush wrote:

> >> If every BGP session in your network is protected by a max-prefix
> >> limit, no matter who leaks, the damage will be limited and contained.
> > true, also not univeral,
>
> the problem with max-prefix is it does not say *which* prefixes.
> so even if the drop-bgp stoopidity is corrected, you could end
> up holding the bogus prefixes, not the good ones.

true, however, my point was that not even the basics are being done :(

Reply via email to