> I see this a lot recently: You are mixing up RfC1918 and NAT. > > If I have globally unique addresses I can NAT them as well > as 10/8. One has nothing to do with the other. > > Having to NAT RfC1918 addresses to reach the internet, does not imply > that I have to have RfC1918 to be able to do NAT.
but having 1918, site-loco, whatever, and wanting to reach the internet REQUIRES nat. we'll love it in ipv6; can't let things be too simple, eh? randy