Then I think that needs to be addressed at the RIPE level. ARIN certainly made me prove that I had a unique routing policy and multiple peering connections. They wanted letters from the ISPs involved stating that yes, I had a peering (or transit) relationship with them.
Owen
--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:14 PM +0100 Cliff Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:56:31AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> As I also stated in my last post (which you snipped out, and is pretty > relevant) is that the handing out of ASN's should be harder. Currently > ASN's are given to every silly dude that says 'i want multihoming'. > This simply isn't true. It was true several years ago, but, is not true now. (At least for ARIN. I don't know what the policies are elsewhere).
I am looking from a RIPE point of view. Lately I see ISPs popping out of the ground requesting ASNs and having actually only 1 upstream (there are 2 upstreams in the routing database, but in the real world there is only 1 upstream).
-- Cliff Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
pgpf0qFJPBDT7.pgp
Description: PGP signature