On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:00:29 EST, John Curran said: > If you believe that REGISTRAR LOCK meets the need, then I've failed > to adequately communicate my requirements. The requirement is my > domain remains unchanged despite complete failure or fraud of any > number of registrars.
Do you have a requirement that the domain remain unchanged even in the face of fraud on the part of the registry itself? And what level of "Yes I really mean it" documentation do you consider sufficient to turn this *off* in case you *do* need to change something? Does it have to resist a forged e-mail? Forged fax and hacking your phone system so they can answer the confirmation callback? Forged notarized forms mailed to the registry rescinding the lock? A determined "black helicopter" attack on the part of a competitor?
pgpEOIUZsoVZU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
