On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:15:51 -0500 (EST), Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your third option is best. (Excuse the signature-pun. :) > > SRS does not require SPF, and provides auditability for forwarded mail: > > http://spf.pobox.com/srs.html >
In which case dont futz about with SES (thats yet another name for SRS i think, I prefer to think I'm the only SRS around) - use BATV instead. Its specced for exactly what #3 says. srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
