In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Oberman" writes: >
> >The law does not require that pr0n be blocked on customer request, only >that access to a list of sites (addresses?) on a published list be >blocked. A very different beast and a task that is not too onerous. No >more so than SPAM RBLs and bogon address RBLs if handled properly. > That is, in fact, similar to a Pennsylvania law that was struck down by a Federal court. CDT's analysis of the Utah law is at http://www.cdt.org/speech/20050307cdtanalysis.pdf --Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
