On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:23:06AM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > > > > 701 is not the most connected, it has only customers and a restrictive > > set of peers? > > Ok, I'm just bored enough to bite.
but not as bored as bill, randy or patrick it would seem :) > If we're talking about a contest to see who has the most number of directly > connected ASNs, I think UU might still win, even with a restrictive set of > peers. I didnt think we were, kinda happened.. if peering partners is a compensation for something else its pretty sad ;) Maybe I'm wrong, i checked with renesys and their data has 701 with 5200 adjacencies followed by 1239 with 3500 anyway i care enough to have snipped the data. > Which begs the question, what is the largest number of ASNs that someone peers > with? Patrick? :) Somehow I suspect that 701's customer base (702 and 703 > aren't included in the above count BTW) overpower even the most aggressively > open of peering policies, in this particular random pointless and arbitrary > contest at any rate. so what are we debating again? :) Steve