I'd prefer it if you gave an opinion on how this was operationally relevant?
> > Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is very unusual to > transfer a trademark without transferring the product it > identifies. I didn't know it was impossible. > > Since you are an expert on the subject, I would like to have > your opinion regarding how ISC can claim a trademark on BIND, > assuming no transfer ever took place. Or if you think it > cannot reasonably make such a claim. >