Not so. The idea of an opposition party suggests the editors of ICW have some desire to be in control. Not at all.
Further, we run a slash server. Most of the content is contributed. We don't have to go hunt for it.
If ICANN ran decent discussion boards, it would put us out o business. One can only hope and dream.
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 4/13/2005 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ICANN is not perfect but it is hard to see anything wrong with this particular action.
what's got to be wrong about it? ICANNwatch is the unelected opposition party to ICANN's unelected majority party. Whatever ICANN does, ICANNwatch finds somebody who opposes it or comes out and opposes it themselves if they must, cause that's what opposition parties do. Being right or wrong or in the service of the community has nothing to do with it.
-- http://www.icannwatch.org Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | [EMAIL PROTECTED] U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm -->It's cool here.<--
