At 17:53 -0400 5/19/05, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Edward Lewis wrote:
It's true that the xn-- convention isn't the best way to encode IDN's, but it has proven to be the optimal one in design (at least).
It's the necessary minimum for compatibilty purposes, but not anywhere near the optimal design.
Moreover, those have nothing to do with each other.
"Optimal" is so subjective. ;)
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar
If you knew what I was thinking, you'd understand what I was saying.
