On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:23PM -0400, Randy Bush wrote: > >> I suspect the right thing to do is to ask why soBGP and sBGP > >> have failed? > > Or maybe, jut maybe, because we've never had the tools to deploy > > it. > > actually, we had a small workshop with sbgp tools at the last > eugene nanog. perhaps it's time for another? bill, can you host > at he next nanog, as it is on your turf?
sure... point me in the right direction :) > but, of course, for real deployment, those tools, built for *bsd > and linux, would limit initial deployment to those running pc-based > routers. to go futher, we would need support from juniper and > other vendors. yes... but it is possible to get the ISP engineering crews to "kick the tyres" w/ generic platforms. > i receive a bgp announcement from a new peer, but the announcement > was originated two weeks ago (shockers! a stable route); was the > asserted path to my new peer valid when the announcement was > originated two weeks ago? once your mind starts down such paranoid > paths, the void opens before one's eyes. surrender! > > randy