On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:36 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
ICANN has no right to claim that they are the authority for the
namespace.
They are NOT.
Horse == dead.
Also note the word PUBLIC in PUBLIC-ROOT.
My i18n must be broken. All I see is SNAKE-OIL.
-david ulevitch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NANGO" <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Enable BIND cache server to resolve chinese domain name?
Hi,
Some of our customer complaint they could not visit
back to their web site, which use chinese domain name.
I google the net and found some one recommend to use
public-root.com servers in hint file.
I found domain name like xn--8pru44h.xn--55qx5d could
not be resolved either.
Our cache server runs BIND9.3.1 with root server list
from rs.internic.net.
Do I need to modify our cache server configuration to
enable it?
regards
Joe
Only if you wish to do all your other customers a disfavour
by configuring your caching servers to support a private
namespace then yes.
I would have thought the Site Finder experience would have
stopped people from thinking that they can arbitarially add
names to to the public DNS.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!DSPAM:42c8a103122651094118373!
