> I'm very much oppossed to /56 because it's still more than most users > need. In and of itself that doesn't matter, but it's also less than > what some users need. This creates the situation where people try to > make do with a /56, find out that they need a /48 after all (all > those /64 ptps...) and have to renumber. I.e., /56 provides too much > potential for shooting yourself in the foot.
ah... so is there the admission that renumbering in IPv6
is pretty much a myth?
--bill
