On Oct 5, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
Matthew Crocker wrote:
I opened a billing/support ticket with Cogent. I'm not planning
on paying my bill or continuing the contract if they cannot
provide full BGP tables and full Internet transport (barring
outages). Luckily I have 2 other providers so I can still reach
Level 3.
I'm curious where in your contract you think Cogent guaranteed you
connectivity to Level 3?
Undereducated rant to follow...
While I realize that the "nuke survivable" thing is probably an old
wives tale, it seems ridiculous that "the Internet" can't adjust by
routing any packets that used to go directly from Cogent to Level 3
though some 3rd (and) 4th (and) 5th set of providers that are
connected in some fashion to both...
Level 3 and Cogent can't be operating in a vacuums - if we can get to
Kevin Bacon in 6 degrees, Level 3 and Cogent should be able to get to
each other in under 30 hops through other providers.
And why isn't this apparently happening automatically? Pardon the
density of my brain matter here, but I thought that was what BGP was
all about?
I welcome any education the group wishes to drop on me in this matter.
If nobody filtered BGP at all (in or out), you would have the state you
are expecting. However, you would have both a capacity problem, and an
economic failure, as you may well end up with cogent trying to send all
(much) of it's level3 destined traffic through a customer's connection
with much smaller pipes... or overloading it's connectivity to one of
its other peers. The economic failure comes because now you're
expecting a third party to transit packets between cogent and level3
without being paid for it (and some of those connections are metered).