There was a 3.0 PDLM release on 11/1/05 for Bittorrent traffic. See http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/pdlm
Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ejay Hire Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:41 AM To: 'Kim Onnel' Cc: 'NANGO' Subject: RE: QoS for ADSL customers I got an off-list reply about using Nbar, but I've never seen a class map that would match torrent. -e > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Kim Onnel > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:12 AM > To: Ejay Hire > Cc: NANGO > Subject: Re: QoS for ADSL customers > > Our ADSL customers traffic is 3 OC3 worth of traffic, I dont > think our management would buy the idea. > > thanks > > > On 12/1/05, Ejay Hire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > Going back to your original question, how to keep from > saturating the network with residential users using > bittorrent/edonkey et al, while suffocating business > customers. Here goes. > > Netfilter/IpTables (and a slew of commercial products I'm > sure) has a Layer 7 traffic classifier, meaning it can > identify specific file transfer applications and set a > DiffServ bit. This means it can tell between a real http > request and a edonkey transfer, even if they are both using > http. It also has rate-limiting capability. So... If you > pass all of the traffic destined for your DSL customers > through an iptables box (single point of failure) then you > can classify and rate-limit the downstream rate on a > per-application basis. > > Fwiw, if you are using diffserv bits, you could push the > rate-limits down to the router with a qos policy in it > instead of doing it all in the iptables box. > > References on this.. The netfilter website (for > classification info) and the Linux advanced router tools > (LART) (qos info/rate limiting) > > -e > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > Behalf Of Kim Onnel > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:26 AM > > To: NANGO > > Subject: Re: QoS for ADSL customers > > > > Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or none > > solution to cap the download stream traffic, our upstream > > will not recieve marked traffic from us, so what can be > done ? > > > > > > On 11/29/05, Kim Onnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > We have Juniper ERX as BRAS for ADSL, its GigE > > interface is on an old Cisco 3508 switch with an old IOS, > its > > gateway to the internet is a 7609, our transit internet > links > > terminate on GigaE, Flexwan on the 7600 > > > > The links are now almost always fully utilized, we > want > > to do some QoS to cap our ADSL downstream, to give room > for > > the Corp. customers traffic to flow without pain. > > > > I'm here to collect ideas, comments, advises and > > experiences for such situations. > > > > Our humble approach was to collect some p2p ports > and > > police traffic to these ports, but the traffic wasnt much, > > > one other thing is rate-limiting per ADSL customers IPs, > but > > that wasnt supported by management, so we thought of > matching > > ADSL www traffic and doing exceed action is transmit, and > > police other IP traffic. > > > > Doing so on the ERX wasnt a nice experience, so > we're > > trying to do it on the cisco. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > >
