On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Douglas Otis wrote: > There is a solution you can implement now that gets rid of these tens of > thousands of virus and abuse laden DSNs you see every day before the > data phase.
And it is *my* responsibility to reject UBE that shouldn't have been generated in the first place, because...? Blocking the UBE is not the solution; it is a bandage over a bleeding artery. The solution is not to generate the UBE in the first place. You'll note that, again, I am very explicitly not equating these to DSNs. As I said before in N forms, I don't care what color of shirt the virus "warning" wears; if sent to a forged address, it is UBE and deserved to be treated as such. -- -- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
