> > > On 12/22/05 1:35 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Robert Boyle wrote: > >> > >>> At 12:56 PM 12/22/2005, you wrote: > >>> P.S. 204/8 was not the only problem, there were problems > with 128/8 and > >>>> 133/8 as well so my apologies to people who may have > noticed problems > >>>> overnight. > >>> > >>> 199.128.0.0/9 too. > >> > >> Yes, legacy blocks (with large number of smaller > allocations) whenever > >> datasize during processing exceeded certain amount. The > bad data was > >> present at 2 of 4 servers for duration of the night but > dns was being > > > > so 50+% of your system was hozed for some long period of > time :( bad. > > > >> changes same time as well, so I don't know how much affect > there was > >> but apparently considerable; this is the most serious > problem in months. > >> > > > > 'most serious problem in months' ... this has happened in > smaller chunks > > during the past 'months' ? yikes... is that noted on your > site so users of > > the 'service' will know what sorts of 'problems' they might be > > encountering due to their reliance on this 'service'? > > I wonder how many problems cymru has had in that period? I'm > guess not so > many...
I mean this in a nice way, really. Look. Smiley. :) Use a blacklist, pay the price. I'd like to know how many people actually went to their boss and said "It was that guy Williams fault even though I control and am responsible for the network.....!" -M<