The first rule of nsp-sec is, you do not talk about nsp-sec The second rule of nsp-sec is, you DO NOT talk about nsp-sec
Rubens On 12/25/05, Hannigan, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What's nsp-sec? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sun Dec 25 04:25:15 2005 > To: Gadi Evron > Cc: Rob Thomas; NANOG > Subject: Re: Destructive botnet originating from Japan > > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:06:38AM -0600, Gadi Evron wrote: > > > > It is difficult to hear something important that one invested much in is > > doing harm, but that is the only conclusion I and others can come up with > > after years of study, and NSP-SEC, as amazing as it has been, has been of > > a negative impact other than to cause a community to form and act > > together. Which is amazing by itself and which is why I believe it > > can do so much more.. even if it is relatively young it has proven > > itself time and time again... I am straying from the subject here. > > Could have told you that a long time ago. NSP-SEC became useless the day > it became so bogged down in its own self-aggrandizing paranoia that no one > could possibly be bothered to actually tell anyone outside of the secret > handshake club about security issues they've spotted. > > On the other hand, if you ARE going to sit around pissing and moaning > about botnets you are too "sekure" to tell anyone else about, thus > assuring they never get fixed, at least it's nice to do it in one secret > place so I don't have to hear it. :) > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) > >