-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hmm..I thought (correct me if I wrong) wsus followed a mirror (distributed) model say if a group of servers were pegged the update process would provide remote clients access to the closet and min latency host(s) in order to distribute the load prevent bandwidth saturation.
regards, /virendra Elijah Savage wrote: > Sean Donelan wrote: > >>So, maybe an operational question. >> >>What are people seeing as far as network traffic loads due to WMF patching >>activity, e.g. auto-update and manual downloads? Microsoft has used >>several CDNs in addition to its own servers to distribute the load >>in the past. > > WSUS servers are being pounded right now. Usually 5 to 7% CPU now 72% > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDvqLlpbZvCIJx1bcRAoF4AJ9pi/xlNkX8mSMT4ogZcVccrJ9ijACg854X JhwaWYg6bEmVf4yHVmY6mQI= =3oZt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----